1.
Comparison of the Hang High Pull and Loaded Jump Squat for the Development of Vertical Jump and Isometric Force-Time Characteristics.
Oranchuk, DJ, Robinson, TL, Switaj, ZJ, Drinkwater, EJ
Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2019;(1):17-24
Abstract
Oranchuk, DJ, Robinson, TL, Switaj, ZJ, and Drinkwater, EJ. Comparison of the hang high pull and loaded jump squat for the development of vertical jump and isometric force-time characteristics. J Strength Cond Res 33(1): 17-24, 2019-Weightlifting movements have high skill demands and require expert coaching. Loaded jumps have a comparably lower skill demand but may be similarly effective for improving explosive performance. The purpose of this study was to compare vertical jump performance, isometric force, and rate of force development (RFD) after a 10-week intervention using the hang high pull (hang-pull) or trap-bar jump squat (jump-squat). Eighteen National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II swimmers (8 males, 10 females) with at least 1 year of resistance training experience volunteered to participate. Testing included the squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump, and the isometric midthigh pull (IMTP). Vertical ground reaction forces were analyzed to obtain jump height and relative peak power. Relative peak force, peak RFD, and relative force at 5 time bands were obtained from the IMTP. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a hang pull (n = 9) or jump-squat (n = 9) training group and completed a 10-week, volume-equated, periodized training program. Although there was a significant main effect of training for both groups, no statistically significant between-group differences were found (p ≥ 0.17) for any of the dependent variables. However, medium effect sizes in favor of the jump-squat training group were seen in SJ height (d = 0.56) and SJ peak power (d = 0.69). Loaded jumps seem equally effective as weightlifting derivatives for improving lower-body power in experienced athletes. Because loaded jumps require less skill and less coaching expertise than weightlifting, loaded jumps should be considered where coaching complex movements is difficult.
2.
Effects of β-alanine supplementation on performance and body composition in collegiate wrestlers and football players.
Kern, BD, Robinson, TL
Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2011;(7):1804-15
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of β-alanine as an ergogenic aid in tests of anaerobic power output after 8 weeks of high-intensity interval, repeated sprint, and resistance training in previously trained collegiate wrestlers (WR) and football (FB) players. Twenty-two college WRs (19.9 ± 1.9 years, age ± SD) and 15 college FB players (18.6 ± 1.5 years) participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Each subject ingested either 4 g·d β-alanine or placebo in powdered capsule form. Subjects were tested pre and posttreatment in timed 300-yd shuttle, 90° flexed-arm hang (FAH), body composition, and blood lactate after 300-yd shuttle. Although not statistically significant (p > 0.05) subjects taking β-alanine achieved more desirable results on all tests compared to those on placebo. Performance improvements were greatest in the FB supplement group, decreasing 300 shuttle time by 1.1 seconds (vs. 0.4-second placebo) and increasing FAH (3.0 vs. 0.39 seconds). The wrestlers, both placebo and supplement, lost weight (as was the goal, i.e., weight bracket allowance); however, the supplement group increased lean mass by 1.1 lb, whereas the placebo group lost lean mass (-0.98 lb). Both FB groups gained weight; however, the supplement group gained an average 2.1-lb lean mass compared to 1.1 lb for placebo. β-Alanine appears to have the ability to augment performance and stimulate lean mass accrual in a short amount of time (8 weeks) in previously trained athletes. Training regimen may have an effect on the degree of benefit from β-alanine supplementation.